![]() If your goal is to help users overcome their software challenges using quicken and leave knowing that they have an avenue they can count on in the future, you may want to take a break, step back and reassess what you're here for. I do appreciate you volunteering your time to answer, but hopefully any future questions will be handled by someone that actually works for quicken with a much higher potential to deliver a satisfied user, which considering the troll like comments is pretty far from what actually occurred. I was trying to avoid doing it by hand as that seemed most likely to produce errors. Quite a few transactions occurred between when I synced the first time and accidentally synced on the desktop. I think splasher did answer my question, even after wading through 3 challenging paragraphs of very tightly spaced text., but not before handing out some helpful advice on text formatting. (White space included for splasher, who is sensitive to lack of white space) This was answered by splasher more exactly. I might suggest that in the future, you use a carriage return every once in awhile to provide breaks and white space and improve readability.Ĭhances are you got everything, but the only way to know for sure is to do the comparison.For notacpa, I didn't ask if the bank marked transactions, I was asking if QUICKEN, the program in question, actually marks each item. I'm not sure which of your scenarios that agrees with since I got lost reading them. So, if a transaction is downloaded and then deleted, doing a second download will not make it available again, it is purposefully ignored by design. Quicken remembers the FITId of every transaction downloaded into an account (each account has its own memory) so that if a transaction is downloaded a second time into the same account, it is ignored in the subsequent downloads. Thanks.Ĭhances are you got everything, but the only way to know for sure is to do the comparison.To explain the process, there is a field in each downloaded transaction called, FITId (Financial Institution Transactions Id) which is supposed to be unique for each transaction. Does that make more sense? I'm trying to avoid a several hour procedure if possible. If the second scenario is true, than quicken will download the missing items again, since they aren't represented in the registry. If the first version is the case, than I will have to manually add those lost transactions to quicken myself. Or, quicken compares it's data with the online version and downloads any transactions that aren't current represented in the register. I guess to phrase the question better I would ask if syncing with the bank marks transactions so that when you return to sync again those transactions have been marked and will not be downloaded again. The best way to find out is to start Quicken on both computers and compare the contents of the registers that would have gotten new transactions.Ĭhances are you got everything, but the only way to know for sure is to do the comparison.thanks for the reply, but I'm trying to avoid comparing 100's of transactions and hoping I don't miss any. "Are they lost, or did the desktop pick them back up on the next sync.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |